To ensure academic coherence, intellectual depth, and a shared scholarly standard, all papers presented at ICAS 2026 are expected to follow the official template of the Journal of Aisyiyah Studies. This template is designed not merely as a technical formatting guide, but as a conceptual framework that reflects the journal’s distinctive identity.
1. Title
The title should be concise, conceptually precise, and analytically grounded. It is expected to reflect the central argument or scholarly contribution of the article rather than merely describing the topic. A strong title signals the article’s theoretical positioning and contextual relevance within Aisyiyah studies and related interdisciplinary fields such as Islamic studies, gender studies, sociology of religion, anthropology, or digital studies. The title should remain clear and readable, ideally within sixteen words, and avoid unnecessary technical language.
2. Author(s)
The author section includes the full name of each contributor, their institutional affiliation, and country. The corresponding author’s email address must be clearly indicated. Additional academic identifiers such as ORCID may be included when available. The order of authorship should reflect scholarly contribution and must be agreed upon by all contributors prior to submission. The presentation of author information should be clear, professional, and consistent with academic standards.
3. Abstract
The abstract is written in English and provides a concise yet comprehensive overview of the article. It establishes the context of the study, identifies the scholarly gap, and states the research question or objective. It briefly explains the methodological approach, summarizes the main findings, and clarifies the article’s contribution to broader academic discussions. The abstract is written as a single coherent paragraph without citations. A short list of keywords follows the abstract to enhance discoverability and thematic clarity.
4. Introduction
The introduction is crafted as a flowing narrative that situates the article within ongoing scholarly debates. It explains why the issue under discussion is significant, identifies limitations or gaps in existing literature, and articulates the research question guiding the study. The introduction also establishes the contextual setting, including the relevance of Aisyiyah as a social, intellectual, or institutional actor. It concludes by clarifying the contribution of the article, whether theoretical, empirical, methodological, or conceptual. The tone remains analytical and academically rigorous rather than promotional.
5. Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
This section outlines the analytical perspective that informs the study and defines the key concepts used throughout the article. Authors are encouraged to engage critically with contemporary scholarship and, when relevant, to place social theory in dialogue with Islamic intellectual traditions. The framework should clearly demonstrate how the chosen concepts guide interpretation and analysis. The writing should remain analytical and reflective, avoiding normative or sermon-like language while acknowledging the intellectual richness of Islamic epistemologies.
6. Methodology
The methodology section provides a transparent account of how the research was conducted. It explains the research design, the nature and sources of data, and the procedures used for data collection and analysis. If applicable, it may also discuss ethical considerations and researcher positionality. The explanation should be detailed enough for readers to understand how conclusions are derived and how evidence supports the argument. Methodological rigor and clarity are central to the journal’s academic standards.
7. Findings
The findings section presents the main results of the study in a structured and coherent manner. Claims must be grounded in evidence, whether empirical data, textual analysis, archival material, or conceptual reasoning. Subheadings may be used to organize themes, but the section should maintain narrative flow. The focus here is on presenting what the research reveals before moving to broader interpretation. The writing should be clear, systematic, and analytically grounded.
8. Discussion
The discussion interprets the findings in relation to the theoretical framework and broader scholarly conversations. It explains the significance of the results and clarifies how they refine, challenge, or extend existing knowledge. A distinctive element of the Journal of Aisyiyah Studies is the articulation of an Aisyiyah perspective in an academic sense. This involves analyzing Aisyiyah as an epistemic and social actor, examining institutional reasoning and transformation as forms of evolving ijtihad, and situating the organization within broader discourses on Muslim women’s agency, leadership, and social reform. The discussion should remain critical and constructive, avoiding both uncritical celebration and reductive critique.
9. Conclusion
The conclusion returns to the research question and synthesizes the main insights of the article. It highlights the scholarly contribution and clarifies its broader implications for Aisyiyah studies and related academic fields. Rather than repeating earlier sections, the conclusion offers a reflective synthesis and may indicate directions for future research.
10. Bibliography
The bibliography follows APA 7th edition citation style. It should reflect engagement with relevant and high-quality scholarship, including peer-reviewed journal articles and significant theoretical works. References should demonstrate awareness of both global academic debates and scholarship related to Indonesian and Muslim contexts. DOI information should be included where available. The reference list serves as an intellectual map of the article’s scholarly grounding and should be carefully curated and accurately formatted.
11. Acknowledgement
The acknowledgement section provides space for authors to recognize funding support, institutional assistance, research collaborators, field participants, or other contributions that do not meet authorship criteria. This section should be concise and professional in tone. If the research was supported by a grant, the funding body and grant number should be clearly stated. Authors may also acknowledge ethical approvals, research assistants, or community partners whose contributions were significant to the completion of the study.
